Key result
Aortic valve neocuspidization resulted in 0% mortality at one year and reduced mean peak gradient to 9 ± 5.3 mmHg postoperatively.
Why the study?
To evaluate immediate and early outcomes of an initial experience with the aortic valve neocuspidization (Ozaki) procedure across a spectrum of aortic valve diseases.
Does aortic valve neocuspidization (AVNeo) improve echocardiographic gradients and clinical outcomes in patients with aortic valve diseases?
Cohort (n=17)
No
Does aortic valve neocuspidization (AVNeo) improve echocardiographic gradients and clinical outcomes in patients with aortic valve diseases?
The Ozaki procedure is a feasible and cost-effective option for aortic valve disease, demonstrating significant reductions in pressure gradients with low mortality at one year.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Early AVNeo outcomes appear feasible in initial experience; leaves open durability and comparative efficacy versus standard valves.
INTRODUCTION: Aortic valve neocuspidization (AVNeo) using fixed autologous pericardium, also known as the Ozaki technique, is an effective therapy for treating aortic valvulopathies. It serves as an alternative to complex aortic valve repair, offering better hemodynamics compared to biological or mechanical valve replacement, without the need for lifelong anticoagulation. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the immediate and early outcomes of our initial experience with the AVNeo procedure in a spectrum of aortic valve diseases. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, seventeen AVNeo procedures were performed between March 2023 and October 2023 at our center. All patients completed one year of follow-up. Outcomes were assessed by echocardiographic evaluation postoperatively and at one year, including complications and mortality. RESULTS: Patient age ranged from 7 to 77 years (mean 35.2 ± 22.4 years), with 3 females among the 17 patients. Aortic valve morphology was bicuspid in 6 (35.3 %) and tricuspid in 11 (64.7 %) patients. Twelve patients had aortic stenosis as the primary pathology, and five had moderate to severe aortic regurgitation. In aortic stenosis patients, the preoperative mean peak gradient was 82.3 ± 20.3 mmHg, and mean gradient was 48.9 ± 18.5 mmHg. Postoperatively, mean peak gradient reduced to 9 ± 5.3 mmHg, and mean gradient to 16.7 ± 9.1 mmHg. Two patients required conversion to prosthetic valve replacement for progressive aortic regurgitation. There was no mortality at one year, though one patient developed severe aortic regurgitation. CONCLUSION: AVNeo is a feasible, reproducible procedure with favorable early outcomes, low pressure gradients, and mild regurgitation at one year. It is a cost-effective option, particularly in resource-limited settings like India.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Naik et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Aortic valve diseases (n=17). Aortic valve neocuspidization (AVNeo) was evaluated on Mortality at one year. Aortic valve neocuspidization resulted in 0% mortality at one year and reduced mean peak gradient to 9 ± 5.3 mmHg postoperatively.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: