Key result
Adjunctive dipyridamole did not significantly reduce the platelet reactivity index compared with double-dose clopidogrel in stented patients with high platelet reactivity (MD 3.1%; P=0.295).
Why the study?
Does adjunctive dipyridamole reduce platelet reactivity in stented patients with high platelet reactivity compared to double-dose clopidogrel?
RCT (n=91)
Does adjunctive dipyridamole reduce platelet reactivity in stented patients with high platelet reactivity compared to double-dose clopidogrel?
Adding dipyridamole to DAPT does not reduce platelet reactivity more than double-dose clopidogrel in stented patients with high platelet reactivity, and both strategies are inadequate to overcome HPR.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Neither adjunctive dipyridamole nor double-dose clopidogrel overcomes HPR post-stenting; confirms limitations of current intensification and supports novel antiplatelet strategies.
Adjunctive use of phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitor can enhance antiplatelet and vasoprotective properties in patients with cardiovascular disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of PDE5 inhibitor dipyridamole on platelet function in stented patients with high platelet reactivity (HPR) during dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and clopidogrel. Patients with HPR after 600-mg clopidogrel loading were randomly assigned to adjunctive dipyridamole 75 mg twice daily to standard DAPT (DIP group; n = 45) or double-dose clopidogrel of 150 mg daily (DOUBLE group; n = 46) for 30 days. Platelet function was assessed at baseline and 30-day follow-up with platelet reactivity index (PRI) by vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein-phosphorylation (VASP-P) assay and platelet aggregation (PA) by light transmittance aggregometry (LTA). Primary endpoint was PRI at 30-day follow-up. HPR was defined as PRI > 50%. Baseline platelet function did not differ between the groups. Following 30-day therapy, platelet function was significantly reduced in the DIP and DOUBLE groups (all p-values ≤ 0.004 and ≤ 0.068, respectively). PRI values were not significantly different between the two groups (mean difference: 3.1%; 95% confidence interval: -2.8% to 9.0%: p = 0.295). PA values and prevalence of HPR were similar between the groups. However, a significant number of patients still exhibited HPR in the DIP (75.6%) and DOUBLE (67.4%) groups. In conclusion, among stented HPR patients, adding dipyridamole to DAPT does not reduce platelet reactivity and prevalence of HPR compared with double-dose clopidogrel therapy, and therefore both strategies are inadequate to overcome HPR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2014) conducted an RCT in High platelet reactivity in stented patients (n=91). Dipyridamole vs. Double-dose clopidogrel (150 mg daily) was evaluated on Platelet reactivity index (PRI) at 30-day follow-up (MD 3.1%, 95% CI -2.8 to 9.0, p=0.295). Adjunctive dipyridamole did not significantly reduce the platelet reactivity index compared with double-dose clopidogrel in stented patients with high platelet reactivity (MD 3.1%; P=0.295).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: