Key result
Isolated bundle branch block in acute myocardial infarction did not independently increase hospital mortality, but right bundle branch block with ST elevation did (OR 1.77; 95% CI 1.19-2.64).
Why the study?
Specificities in clinical presentation and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction patients presenting with left or right bundle branch block versus isolated ST segment elevation are poorly characterized.
Does the presence of left or right bundle branch block worsen clinical outcomes compared to ST segment elevation in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Observational (n=17,464)
Yes
Does the presence of left or right bundle branch block worsen clinical outcomes compared to ST segment elevation in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Absolute Event Rate: 13.9% vs 6.7%
p-value: p=<0.05
In acute myocardial infarction, isolated bundle branch block reflects high-risk clinical and angiographic characteristics but does not independently increase hospital mortality compared to ST segment elevation, unless RBBB is accompanied by concomitant STE.
Characterizes LBBB/RBBB presentations and outcomes in AMI; leaves open whether these warrant distinct risk stratification or therapy.
Background: In patients with acute myocardial infarction, the presence of a left bundle branch block or right bundle branch block may be associated with worse prognosis compared to isolated ST segment elevation. However, specificities in clinical presentation and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction patients with left bundle branch block or right bundle branch block are poorly characterized. Methods: We analysed acute myocardial infarction patients with left bundle branch block (n=880), right bundle branch block (n=732) or ST segment elevation without bundle branch block (n=15,852) included in the Acute Myocardial Infarction in Switzerland-Plus registry between 2008–2019. Results: Acute myocardial infarction patients with bundle branch block were older and had more pre-existing cardiovascular conditions compared to ST segment elevation. Pulmonary oedema and cardiogenic shock were most frequent in patients with left bundle branch block (18.8% vs 12.0% for right bundle branch block and 7.9% for ST segment elevation, p<0.001). Acute myocardial infarction patients with bundle branch block had more three-vessel (40.6% vs 25.3%, p<0.001 vs ST segment elevation) and left main disease (5.6% vs 2.0%, p<0.001 vs ST segment elevation). Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, a composite of reinfarction, stroke/transient ischaemic attack, and death during hospitalization, were highest in acute myocardial infarction patients with left bundle branch block (13.9% vs 9.9% for right bundle branch block and 6.7% for ST segment elevation, p<0.05), which was driven by hospital mortality. After multivariate adjustment, however, mortality was similar in patients with left bundle branch block and lower in patients with right bundle branch block, respectively, when compared to ST segment elevation. Mortality was only increased when a right bundle branch block with concomitant STE was present (odds ratio 1.77, 95% confidence interval 1.19–2.64, p<0.01 vs ST segment elevation). Conclusions: Compared to ST segment elevation, an isolated bundle branch block reflects high-risk clinical characteristics but does not independently determine increased hospital mortality in acute myocardial infarction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meyer et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Acute myocardial infarction (n=17,464). Left or right bundle branch block vs. ST segment elevation without bundle branch block was evaluated on Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (reinfarction, stroke/transient ischaemic attack, and death during hospitalization) (p=<0.05). Isolated bundle branch block in acute myocardial infarction did not independently increase hospital mortality, but right bundle branch block with ST elevation did (OR 1.77; 95% CI 1.19-2.64).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: