Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The prevalence of exercise-induced asthma (EIA) is alarmingly high among both outdoor (O) and ice arena (I) cold weather athletes. This suggests that high exercise ventilation rates of either cold, dry air and/or rink air pollutants favor EIA expression. Despite the fact that airways of the O athlete are subjected to significantly colder ambient temperature than I (−20°C vs. 0–10°C), the prevalence of EIA is not different between the groups. A serendipitous observation that post-exercise mid expiratory flow rates were more impaired in I than in O led us to retrospectively compare pulmonary function test (PFT) results of EIA O and I athletes. PFTs were obtained pre- and 5, 10, and 15 min post- sport-specific exercise. Criterion for subject selection was a greater than 10% post-exercise fall in FEV1. Fifty-four EIA positive I athletes were matched with 54 randomly selected O EIA positive athletes for comparisons of PFT parameters. Maximum post-exercise fall in FEF25–75% was greater for I (27.7 ± 21.0 vs. 19.3 ± 16.6, P < 0.05). The data from this study suggest greater small airway dysfunction in I than in O. It is quite possible that the bronchial hyperreactivity observed in the I athlete is caused by chronic exposure to internal combustion pollutants emitted from ice resurfacing machines. Supported by the United States Olympic Committee.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rundell et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: