Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation between histological invasiveness and the computed tomography (CT) value and size in pure ground-glass nodules (GGNs) to determine optimal "follow-up or resection" strategies. METHODS: Between 2001 and 2014, 78 resected, pure GGNs were retrospectively evaluated. The maximum diameter and CT value of pure GGNs were measured using a computer graphics support system. RESULTS: All GGNs with a maximum diameter ≤10 mm and CT value ≤-600 Hounsfield units (HU) were considered to be noninvasive lesions, while 21 of 26 (81 %) with a maximum diameter >10 mm and CT value >-600 HU were considered to be invasive lesions. With respect to the correlation between each histological type and pure GGN with a maximum diameter ≤10 mm and CT value ≤-600 HU, the specificity was 90 % and the sensitivity and negative predictive value were both 100 % in atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH), while the specificity was 58 % and the sensitivity and positive predictive value were 0 % in minimally invasive and invasive adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSION: Pure GGNs with a maximum diameter of ≤10 mm and CT value of ≤-600 HU are nearly always pre-invasive lesions; therefore, surgery should be carefully selected in such patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kitami et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: