Key result
The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathway reduced hospital stay versus conventional care, while advanced age (OR 2.18) and gastrointestinal obstruction (OR 3.42) increased complication risk.
Why the study?
Although the ERAS pathway is widely applied in colorectal and gastric surgery, some patients are removed from the pathway for various reasons.
What factors are associated with failure of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathway in patients undergoing colorectal and gastric surgery?
Cohort (n=550)
What factors are associated with failure of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathway in patients undergoing colorectal and gastric surgery?
In patients undergoing colorectal and gastric surgery, advanced age, prior abdominal surgery, gastrointestinal obstruction, and stoma formation are significant risk factors for failing the ERAS pathway.
Factors linked to ERAS dropout in GI surgery merit monitoring; leaves open whether targeted interventions improve adherence or outcomes.
Background: The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathway is widely applied in the perioperative period of stomach and colorectal surgery, and can decrease the length of hospital stay of the patients without compromising the safety of the patients. However, some patients are removed from this pathway for various reasons. Here we found some factors that taking the patients out from the procedures.Methods: A retrospective analysis of collected data of 550 patients over a 3-year period was conducted, with 292 in the ERAS group and 258 in the conventional care group. Then various basic elements were analyzed to explore the reasons for the failure to complete the ERAS program.Results: Total length of hospital stay after surgery was significantly shorter in the ERAS group, and a similar incidence of complication rates were observed in the two groups. In this study, the significant factors that associated with complications were advanced age (OR 2.18; p = .031), history of abdominal surgery (OR 2.03; p = .04), incomplete gastrointestinal obstruction (OR 3.42; p < .001), laparoscopic surgery (OR 0.39; p = .004) and intraoperative neostomy (OR 2.37; p = .006).Conclusions: We found that advanced age (>80 years old), history of abdominal surgery, gastrointestinal obstruction and stoma formation were the risk factors. We anticipated to design a risk assessment system upon the high-risk patients from the present ERAS pathway, and make a modified ERAS pathway for those patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in colorectal and gastric surgery (n=550). Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathway vs. conventional care was evaluated on complications. The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathway reduced hospital stay versus conventional care, while advanced age (OR 2.18) and gastrointestinal obstruction (OR 3.42) increased complication risk.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: