Key result
The COVID-19 pandemic has provided a substantial impetus for the rapid expansion of telecardiology and digital health services to safely manage patients with chronic cardiac conditions.
Why the study?
The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated the rapid expansion of telecardiology and digital health as alternatives to traditional in-person care, highlighting the need to evaluate their benefits and potential risks for managing chronic cardiac conditions.
Design
Review
Authors
Loading...
Telecardiology may aid care during restrictions; leaves open its routine efficacy and safety in cardiology.
Telecardiology and digital health provide essential alternatives to in-person cardiac care during the COVID-19 pandemic, though challenges in adoption and evidence of long-term outcomes remain.
García et al. (2020) conducted a review in Cardiovascular Diseases and COVID-19. Telecardiology and Digital Health vs. Traditional in-person cardiac care was evaluated. The COVID-19 pandemic has provided a substantial impetus for the rapid expansion of telecardiology and digital health services to safely manage patients with chronic cardiac conditions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: