Key result
Adoption of the 2019 ESC Guidelines for cardiac imaging in chronic coronary syndromes was associated with fewer invasive coronary angiographies (15% vs. 48%) but a higher diagnostic yield for obstructive CAD (60% vs. 39%) compared to non-adoption.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to assess real-world use of cardiac imaging and adoption of the European Society of Cardiology guidelines in patients with chronic coronary syndromes.
Does adoption of the 2019 ESC Guidelines for cardiac imaging improve diagnostic yield and clinical utility in patients with chronic coronary syndromes?
Observational (n=5,156)
Yes
Does adoption of the 2019 ESC Guidelines for cardiac imaging improve diagnostic yield and clinical utility in patients with chronic coronary syndromes?
Absolute Event Rate: 15% vs 48%
p-value: p=<0.001
Adherence to ESC guidelines for imaging in chronic coronary syndromes is suboptimal, but when followed, it is associated with less invasive testing and higher diagnostic and therapeutic yields.
Guideline-adherent imaging in CCS was associated with higher diagnostic yield and fewer invasives; leaves open whether broader adoption improves hard outcomes.
BACKGROUND: The prospective, multicentre EURECA registry assessed the use of imaging and adoption of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines (GL) in patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS). METHODS: Between May 2019 and March 2020, 5156 patients were recruited in 73 centres from 24 ESC member countries. The adoption of GL recommendations was evaluated according to clinical presentation and pre-test probability (PTP) of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). RESULTS: The mean age of the population was 64 ± 11 years, 60% of patients were males, 42% had PTP >15%, 27% had previous CAD, and ejection fraction was <50% in 5%. Exercise ECG was performed in 32% of patients, stress imaging as the first choice in 40%, and computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) in 22%. Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) was the first or downstream test in 17% and 11%, respectively. Obstructive CAD was documented in 24% of patients, inducible ischaemia in 19%, and 13% of patients underwent revascularization. In 44% of patients, the overall diagnostic process did not adopt the GL. In these patients, referral to stress imaging (21% vs. 58%; P < 0.001) or CTCA (17% vs. 30%; P < 0.001) was less frequent, while exercise ECG (43% vs. 22%; P < 0.001) and ICA (48% vs. 15%; P < 0.001) were more frequently performed. The adoption of GL was associated with fewer ICA, higher proportion of diagnosis of obstructive CAD (60% vs. 39%, P < 0.001) and revascularization (54% vs. 37%, P < 0.001), higher quality of life, fewer additional testing, and longer times to late revascularization. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with CCS, current clinical practice does not adopt GL recommendations on the use of diagnostic tests in a significant proportion of patients. When the diagnostic approach adopts GL recommendations, invasive procedures are less frequently used and the diagnostic yield and therapeutic utility are superior.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miglioranza et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) (n=5,156). Adoption of 2019 ESC Guidelines for cardiac imaging vs. Non-adoption of ESC Guidelines was evaluated on Referral to invasive coronary angiography (ICA) (p=<0.001). Adoption of the 2019 ESC Guidelines for cardiac imaging in chronic coronary syndromes was associated with fewer invasive coronary angiographies (15% vs. 48%) but a higher diagnostic yield for obstructive CAD (60% vs. 39%) compared to non-adoption.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: