Key result
High illness comprehension in Chinese patients with psycho-cardiovascular disease was associated with a greater preference for psycho-cardiovascular clinics (40.14% vs. 25.90%).
Why the study?
Illness comprehension is essential for cardiovascular disease management, but comprehension biases can lead to suboptimal outcomes in psycho-cardiovascular disease.
Cross-Sectional (n=834)
Yes
A vast majority of Chinese patients with coronary heart disease and comorbid psychological distress are undertreated for anxiety and depression, and their level of illness comprehension significantly dictates their healthcare preferences.
Associations between comprehension levels and PCD treatment preferences warrant caution; leaves open whether education improves adherence or outcomes.
Background: Psychological distress, such as depression and anxiety, impacts cardiovascular disease (CVD) prognosis and management. Illness comprehension is essential for effective treatment, but biases can lead to suboptimal outcomes. We explored psycho-cardiovascular disease (PCD) patient characteristics, with a specific focus on comprehension biases and treatment choices from patients' perspectives in China, to improve management strategies. Methods: test, univariate, and multivariate logistic regression to examine patient characteristics. Results: Of 834 enrolled PCD patients, over 90% experienced mild to moderate anxiety and depression, yet less than 10% received treatment. 52.90% of patients had high illness comprehension. Among the high comprehension group, there were fewer labourers (19.30% vs. 26.40%; P < 0.05), fewer older individuals (39.20% vs. 46.90%; P < 0.05), and those with lower household income (15.60% vs. 30.50%; P < 0.05). A greater proportion of those in the high comprehension group lacked insurance (17.50% vs. 10.00%; P < 0.05), and they were more highly educated (42.90% vs. 32.10% with a college education). Additionally, more patients in the high comprehension group frequently received psychological consultation (24.00% vs. 5.10%; P < 0.05) and therapy (7.70% vs. 2.30%; P < 0.05). These patient groups preferred tertiary hospitals (71.66% vs. 63.33%; P < 0.05) and psycho-cardiovascular clinics (40.14% vs. 25.90%; P < 0.05). In comparison, low comprehension patients prioritised cost (32.65% vs. 46.41%; P < 0.05) and favoured a transition to community hospitals (16.55% vs. 25.38%; P < 0.05). Conclusions: More than 90% of PCD patients in Chinese CVD departments experience mild to moderate anxiety and depression with low treatment rates. Different illness comprehension levels are associated with variations in treatment willingness, considerations, health care preferences, medication choices, and illness knowledge acquisition methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xia et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Psycho-cardiovascular disease (coronary heart disease with comorbid anxiety/depression) (n=834). High illness comprehension vs. Low illness comprehension was evaluated on Preference for psycho-cardiovascular clinics for integrated treatment (p=<0.05). High illness comprehension in Chinese patients with psycho-cardiovascular disease was associated with a greater preference for psycho-cardiovascular clinics (40.14% vs. 25.90%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: