Key result
Inoculation and contact transmission of classical swine fever virus in pigs demonstrated significant bottlenecks in transmission, with no tissue-specific virus variants identified.
Why the study?
The surface-exposed E2 protein of classical swine fever virus varies between strains of different virulence, prompting analysis of the importance of two specific amino acid residues in determining properties of a highly virulent strain.
The study demonstrates bottlenecks in the transmission of classical swine fever virus between pigs, with no evidence of tissue-specific virus variants.
The surface-exposed E2 protein of classical swine fever virus is required for its interaction with host cells. A short motif within this protein varies between strains of different virulence. The importance of two particular amino acid residues in determining the properties of a highly virulent strain of the virus has been analyzed. Each of the different viruses tested proved highly virulent, but one of them produced earlier, but not more severe, disease. By analyzing the virus genomes present within infected pigs, it was found that the viruses which replicated within inoculated animals were only a subset of those within the virus inoculum. Furthermore, following contact transmission, it was shown that a very restricted set of viruses had transferred between animals. There were no significant differences in the virus populations present in various tissues of the infected animals. These results indicate mechanisms of virus population change during transmission between animals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Johnston et al. (2020) studied Classical swine fever virus infection. Classical swine fever virus strains with different E2 protein motifs was evaluated on Virus population profiles and virulence. Inoculation and contact transmission of classical swine fever virus in pigs demonstrated significant bottlenecks in transmission, with no tissue-specific virus variants identified.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: