Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To develop a large animal model for studies of laryngeal abductor reinnervation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Six minipigs underwent unilateral anastomosis of the phrenic nerve-abductor branch of the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN). Polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) conduits were used for repair. At each of 30, 60 and 120 days, 2 animals underwent video laryngeal endoscopy (VLE) and were then killed. VLE was also performed in the 120-day pair at 60 days. Nerve-conduit-nerve-muscle samples were fixed for light and immunofluorescence (pan-neurofilaments, S-100) microscopy. Laryngeal muscles were harvested (myosin heavy chain analysis). RESULTS: VLE showed recovery of abductor function in 1 animal at 60 days and in 1 at 120 days. Haematoxylin-eosin staining demonstrated a complex inflammatory response. Eosinophil recruitment was observed. Stepwise regeneration and reorganization of the distal nerve between 30 and 120 days was observed with pan-NF staining. The mean minimum diameter in the reinnervated posterior crico-arytenoids tended to increase for up to 120 days. CONCLUSIONS: Anastomosis of the phrenic nerve-abductor branch of the RLN with a PHB conduit in a pig can result in functional and histological recovery within 2-4 months and appears to at least sustain abductor muscle fibre morphology. Recovery occurs despite a complex inflammatory response, which may be an essential part of healing rather than inhibitory.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Birchall et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: