Why the study?
Does the Blood Pressure Measurement Education and Evaluation Program (BEEP) improve blood pressure measurement accuracy and technique in community-based nurses?
Does the Blood Pressure Measurement Education and Evaluation Program (BEEP) improve blood pressure measurement accuracy and technique in community-based nurses?
An educational program based on AHA guidelines significantly improves blood pressure measurement technique and accuracy among community-based nurses.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports BEEP feasibility for nurse training; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
PURPOSE: Pilot study was developed to determine if a blood pressure measurement training program would improve guideline knowledge and technique in community-based nurses (n= 6). METHODS: American Heart Association guidelines were used to develop the Blood Pressure Measurement Education and Evaluation Program (BEEP). Data on guideline knowledge, device quality, measurement technique, terminal digit bias, range of error, and attitude of change were collected prior and after BEEP. CONCLUSIONS: BEEP development was feasible and acceptable. The device score was 100%. Knowledge improved but not statistically significant (p= 0.64), as did terminal digit bias. Technique prior to BEEP was poor (T= 15) but improved significantly after BEEP (T= 26 on a scale of 32, p= 0.0006). Range of error decreased but was only significant in the diastolic pressure (p= 0.02). IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: BEEP is feasible. Baseline blood pressure measurement technique is poor in community-based nurses. Our study suggests that this poor technique can benefit from an educational program and result in improved blood pressure measurement accuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dickson et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: