Why the study?
Does obesity influence propranolol pharmacokinetics in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass?
Does obesity influence propranolol pharmacokinetics in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass?
Obesity significantly alters the pharmacokinetics of propranolol following CABG with hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass, resulting in higher post-operative plasma concentrations.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May warrant propranolol PK monitoring in obese post-CABG patients; hypothesis-generating for dose adjustments.
Propranolol plasma levels and kinetic disposition may be altered by hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB-H). We investigated the potential influence of obesity on propranolol pharmacokinetics in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting employing CPB-H. Fifteen patients, receiving propranolol perorally pre- (10-40 mg, 2-3 times a day) and post-operatively (10 mg, once a day) were distributed in two groups, based on body mass index (BMI), in obese (n = 9, BMI: mean 29.4 kg/m²) and non-obese (n=6, BMI: mean 24.8 kg/m²). A serial of blood samples was collected at the pre- and post-operative periods at time dosing interval (Ä); propranolol plasma levels were measured one day before and after surgery using a high performance liquid chromatographic procedure described previously. PK Solutions software 2.0 was applied to obtain pharmacokinetic parameters. No changes on kinetic parameters as biological half-life (t1/2, p = 0.0625, NS), volume of distribution (Vd/F, p=0.8438, NS) and plasma clearance (CL T/F, p = 0.1563, NS) were obtained for the non-obese patients, while a prolongation of t1/2 (3.2 to 11.2 h, p< 0.0039), an increase on Vd/F (3.0 to 7.7 L/kg, p<0.0039) and reduction on CL T/F (11.3 to 9.2 mL/min.kg, p<0.0391) were obtained in the post-operative period for obese patients. Pharmacokinetic data could justify propranolol plasma concentrations in obese patients higher than in non-obeses, after surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pereira et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: