Why the study?
The pathogenesis of Takotsubo syndrome is not fully understood, and the prevalence of psychopathological findings compared to healthy subjects, psychiatric patients, and ACS patients had not been determined.
Are psychopathological symptoms more frequent in patients with Takotsubo syndrome compared to healthy subjects, psychiatric patients, and ACS patients?
Are psychopathological symptoms more frequent in patients with Takotsubo syndrome compared to healthy subjects, psychiatric patients, and ACS patients?
Takotsubo syndrome patients exhibit significantly higher levels of anxiety, depression, and other psychopathological symptoms compared to healthy controls and ACS patients, suggesting a strong mind-heart axis involvement.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Psychiatric screening may inform TTS care; leaves open whether brain changes precede or follow the syndrome.
BACKGROUND: Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) is an acute reversible heart dysfunction affecting mostly post-menopausal women, frequently precipitated by a significant stressful event, presenting as an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease. The pathogenesis is not fully understood, but a close relationship between individual's mind, brain, neuroendocrine system and the heart may be involved in a mind-heart axis. The purpose of this study was to compare the prevalence of psychopathological findings in TTS patients as compared to healthy subjects, patients affected by psychiatric diseases and patients affected by ACS. METHODS: This observational study enrolled 40 female subjects divided into 4 subgroups: TTS patients, healthy subjects, psychiatric patients and ACS patients, matched for age. Psychosocial factors and psychopathological dimensions have been evaluated. Patients who signed informed consent were interviewed by the administration of a complex psychometric battery, including Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, State Trait Anxiety Inventory, Form Y. RESULTS: Comparing the groups, the TTS group showed a statistically significant difference vs. ACS group concerning psychological violence subscale (P=0.049) of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire, while significant statistical difference emerged in TTS group vs. healthy subjects control group, regarding cyclothymia subscale (P=0.008). Statistically significant differences were documented in TTS group vs. psychiatric cohort in cyclothymia subscale (P=0.012). Moreover, comparison between TTS and ACS group, revealed a statistically significant difference in the sub-scale of self-confidence and management of negative emotions (P=0.0028). One of the most significant features was the evidence of statistically significant differences in TTS vs. ACS group, concerning total and average value of anxiety (P=0.014 and P=0.031 respectively) and in the comparison of TTS group vs. healthy subjects (P=0.005 for the total anxiety value and P=0.021 for the average value). Finally, both depression and mania were statistically significant raised in the TTS group compared to the healthy subjects' group (P=0.00 and P=0.013, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Psychosocial and psychopathological dimensions of TTS patients have been explored and analyzed in a cohort of TTS patients vs. ACS, healthy subjects and psychiatric patients, showing statistically significant differences among the various groups. Psychopathological symptoms were more frequent in TTS patients, suggesting an evident involvement of mind-heart axis in this disease. Future studies are needed to investigate the cause-effect relationship between psychopathological features and the occurrence of TTS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
MARIANO et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: