Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Positron emission tomography (PET) has emerged as a powerful diagnostic tool in oncology patients. There is evidence of the superior utility over conventional imaging methods of the principal PET tracer 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose in the staging of a range of cancers and monitoring disease recurrence, as well as changing patient management to more appropriate therapy. The methods for evaluating the evidence for PET remain complex, particularly as the standard evidence-based approach of randomized controlled trials is not generally applicable to imaging technologies. PET has the potential to dramatically improve our ability to manage patients with cancer and is also making major contributions to the development of new therapies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrew M. Scott (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: