Why the study?
Type 2 diabetes remains difficult to manage, requiring new therapeutic options targeting unique mechanisms of action.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Population
Obese mice
Comparison
Diphenylbutylpiperidines (pimozide, penfluridol, fluspirilene) vs lurasidone
Design
In silico modeling and in vivo pharmacology animal study
Despite significant progress in understanding the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes (T2D), the condition remains difficult to manage. Hence, new therapeutic options targeting unique mechanisms of action are required. We have previously observed that elevated skeletal muscle succinyl CoA:3-ketoacid CoA transferase (SCOT) activity, the rate-limiting enzyme of ketone oxidation, contributes to the hyperglycemia characterizing obesity and T2D. Moreover, we identified that the typical antipsychotic agent pimozide is a SCOT inhibitor that can alleviate obesity-induced hyperglycemia. We now extend those observations here, using computer-assisted in silico modeling and in vivo pharmacology studies that highlight SCOT as a noncanonical target shared among the diphenylbutylpiperidine (DPBP) drug class, which includes penfluridol and fluspirilene. All three DPBPs tested (pimozide, penfluridol, and fluspirilene) improved glycemia in obese mice. While the canonical target of the DPBPs is the dopamine 2 receptor, studies in obese mice demonstrated that acute or chronic treatment with a structurally unrelated antipsychotic dopamine 2 receptor antagonist, lurasidone, was devoid of glucose-lowering actions. We further observed that the DPBPs improved glycemia in a SCOT-dependent manner in skeletal muscle, suggesting that this older class of antipsychotic agents may have utility in being repurposed for the treatment of T2D.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dakhili et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: