Why the study?
Does a community-based health promotion project improve lifestyle risk factors for coronary heart disease in adults aged 18-64?
Does a community-based health promotion project improve lifestyle risk factors for coronary heart disease in adults aged 18-64?
A community-based health promotion project over four years was associated with significant reductions in smoking and increases in low-fat milk consumption at a highly cost-effective rate of £31 per life year gained.
Community programs may reduce smoking; leaves open whether effects generalize or improve hard CHD outcomes without RCTs.
Objective: To determine whether a community based coronary heart disease health promotion project, undertaken over four years, was associated with changes in the prevalence in adults of lifestyle risk factors known to affect the development of coronary heart disease, and to estimate whether such an approach was cost effective. Design: Prospective, comparative study of the effects of a health promotion intervention on coronary heart disease lifestyle risk factors, assessed by postal questionnaire sent to a randomly chosen sample, both at baseline and after four years. Subjects: Intervention and control populations of adults aged 18-64 in Rotherham, both from areas with a high incidence of coronary heart disease and similar socioeconomic composition. Main outcome measures: Changes in prevalence of lifestyle risk factors between the control and intervention communities from 1991 to 1995. The effect of the intervention on certain lifestyle behaviours was evaluated using multiple logistic regression to model the proportion with a particular behaviour in the study communities as a function of age (18-40 or 41-64 years), sex, the year of observation (1991 or 1995), and area (intervention or control). Results: 6.9% fewer people smoked and 8.7% more drank low fat milk in the intervention area, but no other statistically significant changes between the areas were detected. The estimated cost per life year gained was £31. Conclusions: It is possible to have a cost effective impact on coronary heart disease lifestyle risk factors in a population of adults over four years using only modest resources. Key messages Little is known about the cost effectiveness of focused, heart disease health promotion projects in reducing cardiovascular risk factors over a short period in small populations of adults Research was undertaken to estimate the impact of a heart disease health promotion project—Action Heart—and relate the cost to estimates of health gain Major differences were observed in changes in prevalence of active smoking and consumption of low fat milk between the intervention and control areas over four years The estimated cost per life year gained was £31 Further research is required to ascertain whether the changes in risk factors will be sustained after the end of Action Heart
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baxter et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: