Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this letter, we comment on "Pruning Error Minimization in Least Squares Support Vector Machines" by B. J. de Kruif and T. J. A. de Vries. The original paper proposes a way of pruning training examples for least squares support vector machines (LS SVM) using no regularization (-gamma = infinity). This causes a problem as the derivation involves inverting a matrix that is often singular. We discuss a modification of this algorithm that prunes with regularization (gamma finite and nonzero) and is also computationally more efficient.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kuh et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: