Why the study?
Is the negative U wave a sensitive indicator of acute myocardial ischemia during PTCA compared to ST-segment elevation?
Is the negative U wave a sensitive indicator of acute myocardial ischemia during PTCA compared to ST-segment elevation?
U-wave inversion may be a more sensitive and earlier electrocardiographic indicator of acute myocardial ischemia than ST-segment elevation during coronary angioplasty.
May aid earlier ischemia recognition during PTCA; leaves open validation before clinical adoption.
To clarify the clinical significance of the negative U wave during acute myocardial ischemia, the appearance of the U wave and ST-segment elevation on electrocardiography during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) of the left anterior descending artery (LAD group: 11 patients) or right coronary artery (RCA group: 18 patients) was studied. During PTCA, U-wave inversion (newly developed negative U wave, and increased negativity of the pre-existing negative U wave) was observed in 37 (90%) of 41 patients in the LAD group and in 16 (89%) of 18 patients in the RCA group. The incidence of ST-segment elevation was similar to that of U-wave inversion; however, U-wave inversion appeared before detectable ST-segment elevation in 20 patients (49%) in the LAD group and in 4 patients (22%) in the RCA group. Moreover, U-wave inversion was observed frequently in a wider range of leads than ST-segment elevation. These results suggest that the U wave is a more sensitive indicator of myocardial ischemia than ST-segment elevation in some patients, and that a negative U wave may be produced by a different mechanism than that which produces ST-segment deviation, although both are related to myocardial ischemia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yano et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: