Why the study?
Does a monoclonal antibody against marinobufagenin reduce blood pressure and cardiac fibrosis in partially nephrectomized rats?
Does a monoclonal antibody against marinobufagenin reduce blood pressure and cardiac fibrosis in partially nephrectomized rats?
In a rat model of chronic renal failure, a monoclonal antibody against marinobufagenin reduced blood pressure and reversed cardiac fibrosis, suggesting a potential therapeutic target for uremic cardiomyopathy.
Supports marinobufagenin inhibition in rat models; leaves open human translation pending clinical trials.
BACKGROUND: Cardiotonic steroids (CTS) are implicated in pathophysiology of uremic cardiomyopathy. In the present study, we tested whether a monoclonal antibody (mAb) against the bufadienolide CTS, marinobufagenin (MBG), alleviates cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis in partially nephrectomized (PNx) rats. METHODS: In PNx rats, we compared the effects of 3E9 anti-MBG mAb and of Digibind, an affinity-purified digoxin antibody, on blood pressure and cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis following 4 weeks after the surgery. RESULTS: In PNx rats, a fourfold elevation in plasma MBG levels was associated with hypertension, increased cardiac levels of carbonylated protein, cardiac hypertrophy, a reduction in cardiac expression of a nuclear transcription factor which is a negative regulator of collagen synthesis, Friend leukemia integration-1 (Fli-1), and an increase in the levels of collagen-1. A single intraperitoneal administration of 3E9 mAb to PNx rats reduced blood pressure by 59 mm Hg for 7 days and produced a significant reduction in cardiac weight and cardiac levels of oxidative stress, an increase in the expression of Fli-1, and a reduction in cardiac fibrosis. The effects of Digibind were similar to those of 3E9 mAb, but were less pronounced. CONCLUSIONS: In experimental chronic renal failure, elevated levels of MBG contribute to hypertension and induce cardiac fibrosis via suppression of Fli-1, representing a potential target for therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haller et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: