Why the study?
Does continuous wave Doppler velocimetry combined with cross sectional echocardiography accurately diagnose the site of critical left heart obstruction in neonates?
Does continuous wave Doppler velocimetry combined with cross sectional echocardiography accurately diagnose the site of critical left heart obstruction in neonates?
Continuous wave Doppler velocimetry combined with cross-sectional echocardiography provides accurate, non-invasive localization of critical left heart obstruction in neonates, potentially avoiding invasive investigations.
Supports non-invasive diagnosis of neonatal left heart obstruction; hypothesis-generating and requires larger prospective validation.
If cross sectional echocardiography in isolation is used to diagnose critical left ventricular outflow obstruction in neonates, false positive and false negative diagnoses may result. Continuous wave Doppler velocimetry was used to measure blood flow velocity in the ascending and descending thoracic aorta in six neonates (aged less than 6 weeks) presenting with reduced or absent peripheral pulses in order to determine the important sites of obstruction. This technique demonstrated abnormal high velocity blood flow jets (three times higher than normal) in the ascending aorta in three patients with normal descending aortic flow velocity, suggesting aortic stenosis. In the other three patients velocity in the ascending aorta was normal but high in the descending aorta, suggesting coarctation. The Doppler diagnosis was confirmed in the five patients who required surgery. Two patients had residual high velocity jets after aortic valvotomy. Both had significant pressure gradients across the aortic valve at cardiac catheterisation with good agreement between actual gradients and those predicted by the Doppler technique. Thus a combined anatomical and physiological approach using cross sectional echocardiography and continuous wave Doppler velocimetry enables accurate non-invasive definition of the site of left ventricular outflow obstruction and may obviate the need for invasive investigation in these sick neonates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robinson et al. (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: