Why the study?
Does the T-wave screen help differentiate non-specific T-wave changes from pathologic T waves over long-term follow-up?
Does the T-wave screen help differentiate non-specific T-wave changes from pathologic T waves over long-term follow-up?
The T-wave screen remains a useful diagnostic procedure for evaluating nonspecific T-wave changes when combined with clinical factors.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
T-wave screen stability over 8 years may aid low-risk evaluation when combined with clinical factors; leaves open prospective validation for differentiating nonspecific from pathologic changes.
The clinical significance of alterations displayed on the electrocardiogram is not always clear. A previous study in 1963 revealed that various physiologic manipulations could be used to differentiate non-specific changes from pathologic T waves. A clinical follow-up of the 29 patients initially studied is presented. Repeat T-wave screens, obtained in 23 of the 29 patients after a mean period of eight years, were remarkably similar to the initial screens. Five patients were known to be alive and well. Two patients developed definite evidence for ischemic heart disease; one of these died of acute myocardial infarction. The T-wave screen still is a useful diagnostic procedure when considered along with age, clinical presentation, possible coronary risk factors, and lability in the investigation of alterations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael Rotman (1972) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: