Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The results of the ring conformational analysis of L-proline, N-acetyl-L-proline, and trans-4-hydroxy-L-proline by NMR combined with calculations using density functional theory (DFT) and molecular dynamics (MD) are reported. Accurate values of 1H-1H J-couplings in water and other solvents have been determined. Using a two-site equilibrium model, the Cgamma-endo conformer of L-proline in water has been identified as intermediate between gammaTdelta [twist(Cgamma-endo, Cdelta-exo)] and gammaE [envelope(Cgamma-endo)] and the Cgamma-exo conformer as betaTgamma. Both conformers were equally populated at room temperature. The N-acetyl [cis-rotamer gammaTbeta(80%)/gammaE(20%) and trans-rotamer gammaTbeta(61%)/gammaE(39%)] and 4-hydroxy (gammaEpsilon) derivatives showed significant changes in both the population and the geometries of the preferred ring conformers. The combination of NMR predicted populations with the DFT B3LYP/6-311+G(2d,p)/IEFPCM calculations proved successful, resulting in fairly accurate predictions of J-couplings. Simulations using MD were mostly in favor of the two-site equilibrium model between Cgamma-endo and Cgamma-exo conformers, similar to that used for the analysis of NMR J-couplings. Various force fields examined for MD simulations failed to reproduce the ring conformational geometries and populations of L-proline in water accurately, while significantly better agreement with NMR was found for trans-N-acetyl-L-proline using GROMOS and AMBER force fields.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aliev et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: