Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Stereoselective isomerisations of rel-(2R,4S,5R)-4-(2′,5′-dimethoxyphenyl)-2,5-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolane 1 and the 2∶1 epimeric mixture of rel-(2S,4R,5R)- and rel-(2R,4R,5R)-4-(2′,5′-dimethoxyphenyl)-2,5-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolanes 2 and 3 with titanium tetrachloride at –78 °C afford rel-(1R,3R,4S)- and rel-(1S,3R,4R)-4-hydroxy-5,8-dimethoxy-1,3-dimethylisochromanes 25 and 30, respectively. The yields are only moderate owing to the competing influence of the 2′-methoxy group in the starting dioxolanes, and are improved significantly when this group is replaced by a 2′-chloro substituent. rel-(2R,4S,5R)-4-(2′-Chloro-5′-methoxyphenyl)-2,5-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolane 13 under similar conditions is isomerised smoothly to rel-(1R,3R,4S)-5-chloro-4-hydroxy-8-methoxy-1,3-dimethylisochromane 34 as the sole reaction product. In contrast the C-2 epimers rel-(2R,4R,5R)- and rel-(2S,4R,5R)-4-(2′-chloro-5′-methoxyphenyl)-2,5-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolanes 14 and 15 each favour the formation of rel-(1R,3R,4R)-5-chloro-4-hydroxy-8-methoxy-1,3-dimethylisochromane 36 at –78 °C, while at –95 °C the 1S product 35 predominates. Dioxolane 14 isomerises more rapidly than its C-2 epimer 15, and both these reactions are under kinetic not thermodynamic control.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giles et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: