Why the study?
Do ARBs reduce albumin-induced cell damage and oxidative stress in human renal proximal tubular epithelial cells?
Do ARBs reduce albumin-induced cell damage and oxidative stress in human renal proximal tubular epithelial cells?
ARBs demonstrate renal tubular cell-protective properties by decreasing oxidative stress during albumin-induced damage in vitro.
ARBs may attenuate albumin-induced tubular oxidative stress in vitro; leaves open clinical translation in proteinuric kidney disease.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Proteinuria is not merely a marker of chronic nephropathies, but may also be involved in the progression to end-stage renal failure. We investigated the effect of angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (ARBs) on albumin-induced cell damage in human renal proximal tubular epithelial cells (RPTEC). METHODS: The N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase (NAG) and 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) levels in the medium after albumin treatment with ARBs were determined by commercially available kits. The levels of p22(phox) protein in RPTEC were measured using Western blotting after albumin treatment with ARBs. Angiotensin II concentrations in cell media and cell lysates were assayed with a commercially available kit. RESULTS: Human albumin (0.1-10 mg/ml) dose-dependently increased NAG release and olmesartan or valsartan (10(-9)-10(-7) mol/l) showed a significant reduction on albumin (1 mg/ml)-induced NAG release in RPTEC. Albumin treatment (1 mg/ml) showed significant increases in p22(phox) protein levels in RPTEC and ARBs significantly decreased albumin-induced p22(phox) protein levels. Significant increases in 8-OHdG levels were observed in the albumin (1 mg/ml)-treated group and ARBs markedly reduced albumin-induced 8-OHdG levels in RPTEC. Human albumin dose-dependently increased angiotensin II concentrations in both cell media and lysates. CONCLUSION: These observations suggest renal tubular cell-protective properties of ARBs related to decreased oxidative stress during proteinuria.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takao et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: