Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Patients with gastric cancer are aging in Japan. It is not clear which patients and which surgical procedures have survival benefits after gastrectomy. A multivariate analysis was performed.Methods: The medical records of 166 patients aged ≥80 years who underwent gastrectomy without macroscopic residual tumors were retrospectively reviewed. Univariate and multivariate analyses using Cox proportional hazard models were performed to detect prognostic factors for overall survival.Results: In univariate analyses, age (≥90 vs. ≥80, <85), performance status (3 vs. 0), the physiological score of the Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (POSSUM) (≥40 vs. ≥20, ≤29), Onodera’s prognostic nutritional index (<40 vs. ≥45), American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA-PS) (3, 4 vs. 1, 2), surgical approach (laparoscopic vs. open), extent of gastrectomy (total, proximal vs. distal), extent of lymphadenectomy (D1 vs. ≥D2), pathological stage (II-IV vs. I), and residual tumor (R1 vs. R0) were significantly correlated with worse overall survival. Multivariate analysis revealed that ASA-PS [3, 4 vs. 1, 2, hazard ratio (HR) 2.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24-4.24], extent of gastrectomy (total vs distal, HR 2.17, 95% CI 1.10-4.31), (proximal vs. distal, HR 4.05, 95% CI 1.45-11.3), extent of lymphadenectomy (D0 vs. ≥D2, HR 12.4, 95% CI 1.58-97.7) and pathological stage were independent risk factors for mortality.Conclusions: ASA-PS was a useful predictor for postoperative mortality. Gastrectomy including cardia and excessive limitation of lymphadenectomy are best avoided.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Endo et al. (2021) studied this question.