Why the study?
Does high renin-angiotensin system activity worsen cognitive dysfunction and symptoms during hypoglycaemia in patients with type 1 diabetes?
Does high renin-angiotensin system activity worsen cognitive dysfunction and symptoms during hypoglycaemia in patients with type 1 diabetes?
High RAS activity in type 1 diabetes is associated with increased cognitive dysfunction and blunted symptoms during mild hypoglycaemia, potentially explaining the increased risk of severe hypoglycaemia in these patients.
High RAS activity may heighten cognitive vulnerability to hypoglycemia in T1D; leaves open whether RAS modulation reduces severe hypoglycemia risk.
INTRODUCTION: High basal renin-angiotensin system (RAS) activity is associated with increased risk of severe hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes. We tested whether this might be explained by more pronounced cognitive dysfunction during hypoglycaemia in patients with high RAS activity than in patients with low RAS activity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine patients with type 1 diabetes and high and nine with low RAS activity were subjected to hypoglycaemia and euglycaemia in a cross-over study using an intravenous insulin infusion protocol. Cognitive function, electroencephalography, auditory evoked potentials and hypoglycaemic symptoms were recorded. RESULTS: At a hypoglycaemic nadir of 2.2 (SD 0.3) mmol/L the high RAS group displayed significant deterioration in cognitive performance during hypoglycaemia in the three most complex reaction time tasks. In the low RAS group, hypoglycaemia led to cognitive dysfunction in only one reaction time task. The high RAS group reported lower symptom scores during hypoglycaemia than the low RAS group, suggesting poorer hypoglycaemia awareness. CONCLUSION: High RAS activity is associated with increased cognitive dysfunction and blunted symptoms during mild hypoglycaemia compared to low RAS activity. This may explain why high RAS activity is a risk factor for severe hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Høi-Hansen et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: