This paper will attempt to position the Creative Village project within the parameters of an international debate on public art, sustainability and education. It will begin with a brief history of the project and its community and arts origins, then examine its engagement with environmentally‐responsive art and design, and finally its integrative educational paradigm. I will argue that the value and significance of the programme is that it has successfully bridged complex educational, design, community and environmental goals through having clear core values and a practice of flexible delivery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Catherine De Lorenzo (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: