Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Discourse is often considered as a taken‐for‐granted notion, however, it is already a representational genre of design thinking whether written/ unwritten, spoken/unspoken, designed/ undesigned, realised/unrealised. This article explores current architectural discourse to understand its relations with the design thinking transmitted through various modes of representations in media, education and practice, and to find out how such discourse might implicitly influence design ideas. The article argues that discourse, in this context, will stand as a product in itself in architectural culture. Moreover, a cross‐view of today's architectural discourses will inform us about the present state of architecture, how contemporary architects express themselves or communicate from such points of view, and what might be the emergent issues and possibilities in architecture and design representation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Şentürer et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: