(Sr 1 - x, Zn x ) 1 - y (Al 1.98, B 0.02 )O 4:Eu y 2+ green phosphor particles for ultraviolet light-emitting diodes (UV LEDs) were prepared by spray pyrolysis and their luminescent properties were investigated with changing the reducing temperature, the concentration of the activator, and the ratio of Sr to Zn. For the Sr(Al 1.98, B 0.02 )O 4:Eu 2+ phosphor, pure monoclinic SrAl 2 O 4 phase was formed when the post-treatment temperature was 1100−1200 °C. Over 1300 °C, however, the Sr 4 Al 14 O 25 phase appeared as a minor phase, which induced a blue shift in the emission peak. The highest intensity of Sr(Al 1.98, B 0.02 )O 4:Eu 2+ phosphor was achieved when the reducing temperature and the content of Eu 2+ were 1200 °C and 10 mol % of the strontium, respectively. It was found that the substitution of 10−50% Zn atoms instead of the strontium greatly enhanced the 520 nm green emission, especially for the excitation wavelength range from 380 to 420 nm. At the high Zn concentration ( x > 0.7), a new blue (460 nm) emission was observed and stable even at ambient temperature. This blue emission disappeared when the Zn content became lower than 0.7. The excitation spectrum of (Sr 1 - x, Zn x )(Al 1.98, B 0.02 )O 4:Eu 2+ phosphor ( x ≤ 0.7) well overlapped with the 460 nm blue emissions. Consequently, it was concluded that the new blue sites successfully played the role of sensitizer for the energy transfer, which is responsible for the enhancement of the luminescence intensity. Finally, the optimized phosphor (Sr 0.6, Zn 0.4 ) 0.9 (Al 1.98, B 0.02 )O 4:Eu 2+ 0.1 showed 185% improved emission intensity compared with that of the Sr 0.9 (Al 1.98, B 0.02 )O 4:Eu 2+ 0.1 phosphor under ultraviolet (λ ex = 393 nm) excitation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jung et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: