A series of CuO x catalysts dispersed on SiO 2 −Al 2 O 3 support with a copper content from 0.2 to 12 wt % corresponding to 0.04−3.7 atom Cu nm -2 was prepared by chemisorption-hydrolysis method from copper solutions. The catalysts were characterized in their bulk (XRD, redox cycles with H 2 and O 2 ) and surface (N 2 adsorption, SEM, XPS, and DRS) properties. Copper species were found to be uniformly spread on the SiO 2 −Al 2 O 3 support as small aggregates both in the low and high copper loaded samples. Spectroscopic evidence agrees with Cu 2+ presence in an axially distorted octahedral environment of O-containing ligands. At high copper loading, the existence of copper centers in closer interaction occurred forming structures of oxocations-like type. Temperature programmed reduction (TPR) experiments confirmed the presence of dispersed copper species which underwent complete reduction. Comparing the position and shape of two successive TPR profiles, carried out interposing an oxidation run (temperature programmed oxidation), it was found that the smallest CuO x centers (<1 atom Cu nm -2 ) are characterized by low stability and high mobility. Increasing the copper content diminished the mobility of the CuO x species, as larger CuO x aggregates were formed. The selective catalytic reduction of NO x with ethene in the presence of excess oxygen was studied in a flow apparatus at fixed reactant concentration (1500 ppm of NO x and C 2 H 4 and 15000 ppm of O 2 ) and contact time (8 g s mmol -1 ), with an online FT-IR analytical device. Catalysts containing up to about 1 atom Cu nm -2 displayed very little activity, while catalysts with higher copper content were active and selective. Maximum activity was associated with samples containing 1.5−2 atom Cu nm -2, while samples with higher copper concentration were less active. Results point to the need to individuate relationships between structure and catalyst properties and activity to optimize the preparation of suitable tailored copper-containing catalysts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bennici et al. (2003) studied this question.