Why the study?
Does sustained release procainamide maintain uniform serum drug levels over a 6-hour dosing interval in patients with ischemic heart disease?
Does sustained release procainamide maintain uniform serum drug levels over a 6-hour dosing interval in patients with ischemic heart disease?
Sustained release procainamide administered every 6 hours maintains stable serum concentrations with minimal variation in patients with ischemic heart disease, supporting its use for patient convenience without sacrificing efficacy.
Supports 6-hour dosing convenience in ischemic heart disease; hypothesis-generating pending randomized outcome trials.
Despite widespread marketing of a sustained release preparation of procainamide hydrochloride (PROCAN-SR, Parke-Davis), published literature demonstrating its efficacy in maintaining uniform serum drug levels over a 6-hour dosing interval is derived from only normal healthy volunteers. Thirty-three patients with ischemic heart disease, ages 30-88 years, were administered 1-4g/24 hours (mean dose 34 mg/kg/day) of PROCAN-SR in 4 equally divided doses on a Q6H schedule. After achievement of steady-state equilibrium drug concentration, procainamide and N-acetylprocainamide levels were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography on sera obtained from blood samples drawn 2, 3.5 and 5 hours after an oral dose. Mean maximal procainamide and N-acetylprocainamide serum concentrations were 4.6 +/- 1.8 microgram/ml and 4.2 +/- 2.1 micrograms/ml respectively. Mean minimal concentrations were 3.5 +/- 1.7 microgram/ml and 3.6 +/- 2.0 micrograms/ml respectively. The mean change in drug concentration was small (1.1 microgram/ml procainamide and 0.6 microgram/ml N-acetylprocainamide) with procainamide and N-acetylprocainamide concentrations varying only by 27 and 15 percent respectively. These data demonstrate in a population of patients with ischemic heart disease, that Q6H dosing with a sustained release procainamide hydrochloride preparation (PROCAN-SR, Parke-Davis) is associated with only a small acceptable variation between maximal and minimal serum procainamide and N-acetylprocainamide concentrations. This preparation should, therefore, offer greater patient convenience and compliance without sacrificing antiarrhythmic efficacy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zema et al. (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: