Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The aim of this article is to situate archaeological approaches to modern conflicts within a framework of conflict memory and commemoration. A critical appreciation of historical archaeology as a commemorative practice requires a firm grounding in memory theory, specifically the formation and contestation of memory narratives. This article offers a detailed analysis of the relevant theories and demonstrates their applicability in the contested archaeology of the Nazi era in Berlin. On the basis of this critique I argue that archaeological work on contested sites offers a unique and powerful forum for socially engaged interdisciplinary research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gabriel Moshenska (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: