Why the study?
Most fiber wearables face mechanical strength restrictions and need to fulfill essential requirements of flexibility and stretchability for vital signal monitoring.
Does a balloon-shaped fiber wearable device accurately monitor human pulse and respiration compared to commercial devices?
Does a balloon-shaped fiber wearable device accurately monitor human pulse and respiration compared to commercial devices?
A novel balloon-shaped fiber wearable device demonstrates accurate and detailed human pulse and respiration monitoring, offering a flexible and stretchable alternative to current commercial sensors.
May enable flexible pulse monitoring in wearables; leaves open clinical validation in larger studies.
Wearable technologies have achieved tremendous success in medical‐grade human vital signal monitoring. Herein, a unique geometry (balloon shaped) and usage of very economical polymer embedded single mode fiber based modal interferometry that not only overcome the mechanical strength restrictions of most of the fiber wearables but also fulfil the two most important and necessary requirements of any wearable system: flexibility and stretchability are reported. Here, the human pulse rate and respiration rhythm are successfully monitored by placing the wearables at appropriate positions on different human subjects. The wearable system when compared with the other two commercial approaches: piezoelectric and Photoplethysmography shows better results in terms of pulse visibility. The wrist pulse detection by the proposed system shows 72 bpm and can distinguish different human pulse parameters such as main peak, tidal peak, dicrotic wave peak, and dicrotic notch. Further, three volunteers’ heart beat values obtained from the proposed system very well match with the commercial heart‐rate meter thereby showing the alternative and better approach for futuristic health monitoring wearable device.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mishra et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: