Why the study?
The hemodynamic consequences of a persistent reduced ejection fraction and unknown cardiac output on the brain have not been thoroughly studied.
Does heart failure with reduced ejection fraction impair neurovascular coupling and cerebral autoregulation compared to recovered ejection fraction and healthy controls?
Does heart failure with reduced ejection fraction impair neurovascular coupling and cerebral autoregulation compared to recovered ejection fraction and healthy controls?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Patients with HFrEF exhibit severely dysfunctional neurovascular coupling compared to those with recovered EF and healthy controls, highlighting a potential mechanism for cognitive impairment in heart failure.
The hemodynamic consequences of a persistent reduced ejection fraction and unknown cardiac output on the brain have not been thoroughly studied. We sought to explore the status of the mechanisms of cerebrovascular regulation in patients with heart failure with reduced (HFrEF) and recovered (HFrecEF) ejection fraction. We monitored cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) with transcranial Doppler and blood pressure. Cerebral autoregulation, assessed by transfer function from the spontaneous oscillations of blood pressure to CBFV and neurovascular coupling (NVC) with visual stimulation were compared between groups of HFrEF, HFrecEF and healthy controls. NVC was significantly impaired in HFrEF patients with reduced augmentation of CBFV during stimulation (overshoot systolic CBFV 19.11 ± 6.92 vs. 22.61 ± 7.78 vs. 27.92 ± 6.84, p = 0.04), slower upright of CBFV (rate time to overshoot: 1.19 ± 3.0 vs. 3.06 (4.30) vs. 2.90 ± 3.84, p = 0.02); p = 0.023) and reduced arterial oscillatory properties (natural frequency 0.17 ± 0.06 vs. 0.20 ± 0.09 vs. 0.24 ± 0.07, p = 0.03; attenuation 0.34 ± 0.24 vs. 0.48 ± 0.35 vs. 0.50 ± 0.23, p = 0.05). Cerebral autoregulation was preserved. The neurovascular unit of subjects with chronically reduced heart pumping capability is severely dysfunctional. Dynamic testing with transcranial Doppler could be useful in these patients, but whether it helps in predicting cognitive impairment must be addressed in future prospective studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aires et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: