Why the study?
Does GS-6615 inhibit late INa and suppress arrhythmias in a rabbit model of LQT3?
Does GS-6615 inhibit late INa and suppress arrhythmias in a rabbit model of LQT3?
GS-6615 selectively inhibits late Na+ current and suppresses arrhythmias in a preclinical model of LQT3 without affecting peak Na+ current.
GS-6615 may stabilize repolarization in LQT3; leaves open broader antiarrhythmic efficacy in humans.
Background and Purpose Enhanced late Na+ current (late INa) in the myocardium is pro‐arrhythmic. Inhibition of this current is a promising strategy to stabilize ventricular repolarization and suppress arrhythmias. Here, we describe GS‐6615, a selective inhibitor of late INa, already in clinical development for the treatment of long QT syndrome 3 (LQT3). Experimental Approach The effects of GS‐6615 to inhibit late INa, versus other ion currents to shorten the ventricular action potential duration (APD), monophasic APD (MAPD) and QT interval, and decrease to the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias was determined in rabbit cardiac preparations. To mimic the electrical phenotype of LQT3, late INa was increased using the sea anemone toxin (ATX‐II). Key Results GS‐6615 inhibited ATX‐II enhanced late INa in ventricular myocytes (IC50 = 0.7 μM), shortened the ATX‐II induced prolongation of APD, MAPD, QT interval, and decreased spatiotemporal dispersion of repolarization and ventricular arrhythmias. Inhibition by GS‐6615 of ATX‐II enhanced late INa was strongly correlated with shortening of myocyte APD and isolated heart MAPD (R2 = 0.94 and 0.98 respectively). In contrast to flecainide, GS‐6615 had the minimal effects on peak INa. GS‐6615 did not decrease the maximal upstroke velocity of the action potential (Vmax) nor widen QRS intervals. Conclusions and Implications GS‐6615 was a selective inhibitor of late INa, stabilizes the ventricular repolarization and suppresses arrhythmias in a model of LQT3. The concentrations at which the electrophysiological effects of GS‐6615 were observed are comparable to plasma levels associated with QTc shortening in patients with LQT3, indicating that these effects are clinically relevant.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rajamani et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: