Why the study?
Are rare coding variants in ion channel genes more common in ventricular fibrillation survivors with coronary artery disease compared to controls?
Are rare coding variants in ion channel genes more common in ventricular fibrillation survivors with coronary artery disease compared to controls?
Rare coding variants in long QT genes are significantly more prevalent in CAD patients who survive ventricular fibrillation, suggesting a mechanistic genetic role in this subgroup.
Supports genetic predisposition to VF in CAD; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice or prompt screening.
BACKGROUND: Observations from population-based studies demonstrated a strong genetic component of sudden cardiac death. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that ion channel genes mutations are more common in ventricular fibrillation (VF) survivors with coronary artery disease (CAD) compared to controls. METHODS: The entire coding sequence of KCNQ1, KCNH2, SCN5A, KCNE1, and KCNE2 genes was analyzed in 45 (five females) CAD individuals-survivors of documented VF and in 90 matched healthy controls. In another control group of 141 matched patients with CAD without malignant arrhythmias, the exons containing rare coding variants found in the VF survivors were sequenced. RESULTS: The carrier frequency of all the rare sequence variants was significantly higher in the VF survivors (8/45, 17.8%) than in CAD controls (3/141, 2.2%, P = 0.001). In VF survivors, four coding variants in eight individuals were found. Three in KCNH2 gene: R148W and GAG186del are novel; P347S was previously related to long QT syndrome. In SCN5A gene, P2006A variant was found in five unrelated males. This variant has been demonstrated previously to have small effect on sodium channel kinetics. No rare coding variants were found in the healthy controls. The P2006A variant was found in three CAD controls. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of selected, rare coding variants in five long QT genes was significantly higher in cases versus controls, confirming a mechanistic role for these genes among a subgroup of patients with coronary disease and VF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Novotný et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: