Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper presents a comparative study of different static hysteresis models coupled to the parametric magneto-dynamic model of soft magnetic steel sheets. Both mathematical and behavioral as well as physically based approaches are discussed with respect to the ability to predict the dynamic hysteresis loop shape and iron loss under arbitrary excitation waveforms. Both current- as well as voltage-driven excitation cases are evaluated. The presented analysis discusses and points out advantages and limitations of the majority of the well-known static hysteresis models. In this way, it supports the selection of adequate hysteresis models for the specific application, i.e., smooth excitations, distorted flux waveforms, transients, or steady-state regimes. Comparisons against measurements for a M400-50A electrical steel over a wide range of magnetic flux density and frequencies for both sinusoidal and arbitrary excitations are analyzed. In the analysis hysteresis loop shapes, power losses as well as NRMS errors of individual loop sections are compared.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Steentjes et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: