Why the study?
To evaluate the correlation between the 1-minute sit-to-stand test and the 6-minute walk test and determine whether 1STST can serve as a valid alternative to 6MWT in cardiorespiratory disorders.
Does the 1-minute sit-to-stand test correlate with the 6-minute walk test in patients with cardiorespiratory disorders?
Does the 1-minute sit-to-stand test correlate with the 6-minute walk test in patients with cardiorespiratory disorders?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This review aims to determine if the 1-minute sit-to-stand test is a valid alternative to the 6-minute walk test in patients with cardiorespiratory disorders.
Cardiorespiratory disorders, including cardiovascular and respiratory conditions, are significant global health issues, with millions of deaths annually attributed to these causes. Environmental factors play a substantial role in increasing the risk of these diseases. Children and adolescents with low cardiorespiratory fitness are at a higher risk of developing cardiovascular diseases later in life, and their fitness levels tend to remain low over the years. The 6-minute walk test (6MWT) is commonly used to assess exercise tolerance in patients with chronic lung diseases and cardiac conditions, while the 1-minute sit-to-stand test (1STS) measures a participant's ability to perform daily activities. This brief review was conducted on databases from Pubmed, Google scholar and Research Gate to find out the correlation between 1-min-sit-to-stand test and 6-min walk test in patients with cardiorespiratory disorders. This review included 10 studies on the comparison between 1-min-sit-to-stand and 6-min walk test in patients with cardiorespiratory disorders so as to frame a definite conclusion as to whether 1STST can be a valid alternative to 6MWT in the cardiorespiratory disorders.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaur et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: