This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Sugar mills processing sugar beet generate large amounts of sugar beet pulp (SBP), a carbohydrate-rich byproduct composed of 22–30 % cellulose, 24–32 % hemicellulose, and 15–20 % pectin. Mild, chemical-free hydrothermal pretreatment offers a promising approach to recover these compounds while minimizing pectin degradation, reducing chemical use, and lowering operating costs for value-added applications. This study evaluates the effects of chemical-free hydrothermal pretreatment on cellulosic sugars recovery and its synergy with subsequent pectin extraction under pretreatment conditions ranging from 80°C to 120°C for 15–45 min. Results show that increasing pretreatment severity preserved most glucans with 4 % decrease in galacturonan content. Optimal pretreatment (100°C for 45 min) followed by enzymatic hydrolysis achieved the best glucose (92 %) and pentose (74 %) yields, while galacturonan remained concentrated in the residual solids. Subsequent citric acid extraction at 80°C for 3 hr and a solid-to-liquid ratio of 1:15 yielded up to 85 % pectin, significantly lowering water, chemical, and energy requirements compared to conventional industrial operations. The integration of mild hydrothermal pretreatment with enzymatic hydrolysis thus maximized sugar recovery and enabled efficient downstream pectin extraction without compromising product yields. These findings advance low-impact valorization strategies to reinforce SBP’s values in biorefinery.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kumar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: