Low-temperature bombardment (77^∘{}K) of synthetic crystalline quartz with fast electrons induces optical absorption (C band) near 220 m{μ}. For 40^∘{}C neutron irradiations the absorption maximum is near 210 m{μ}. The absorption has an orientation dependence when produced by electron irradiation. This dependence is exhibited by a shift in the position of maximum absorption from 220 m{μ} for samples cut perpendicular to the c axis (Z cut) to 217 m{μ} for samples cut parallel to the c axis (Y cut). The absorption in the Z-cut samples is about twice that of the Y-cut samples for equal integrated flux. In neutron-irradiated material no such dependence is noted. The defect giving rise to the C-band absorption anneals near 225^∘{}C. The electron or hole occupying the defect, however, is relased below room temperature, removing the optical absorption. After heating to temperatures below 225^∘{}C, the original absorption obtained after electron irradiation at 77^∘{}K can be regained by a brief re-irradiation at 77^∘{}K (0.01 of the original integrated flux). A similar electron exposure at low temperature augments the absorption induced by fast neutrons at 40^∘{}C and introduces a strong absorption at 230 m{μ} which was not previously discernible. The magnitude of the C-band absorption in electron-irradiated material is strongly dependent on the crystal growth rate, increasing by a factor of about 17 for a growth rate increase of 4.5. The increase for the band produced by neutron bombardment [5×{}10¹⁷ nvt (fast)] is only about 25%. The comparison of electron irradiation and x-ray bombardments, and noncorrelation of absorption with impurity content, indicate that the defect responsible for the C-band absorption is produced by direct Coulomb encounters with lattice constituents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
George W. Arnold (1965) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: