Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Because the electrophysiological effects of pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) on the heart are little known, we studied the regulation of the atrial ATP-sensitive K(+) (K(ATP)) current by PACAP on primary cultured neonatal rat atrial myocytes. PACAP-38 stimulates cAMP production with EC(50) = 0.28 nmol/l (r = 0.92, P < 0.02). PACAP-38 and PACAP-27 (10 nmol/l) have similar maximal effects, whereas 100 nmol/l vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) is 2.7 times less effective (P < 0.05). RT-PCR shows the presence of cloned PACAP receptors PAC(1) (> or =2 isoforms), VPAC(1), and VPAC(2). PACAP-38 dose dependently activates the whole cell atrial K(ATP) current with EC(50) = 1-3 nmol/l (n = 44). Maximal effects occur at 10 nmol/l (91 +/- 15 pA/pF, n = 18). Diazoxide further increases the PACAP-activated current by 78% (P < 0.05; n = 6). H(89) (500 nmol/l), a protein kinase A (PKA) inhibitor, reduces the PACAP-activated K(ATP) current to 17.8 +/- 9.6% (n = 5) of the maximal diazoxide-induced current and totally inhibits the cAMP-induced K(ATP) current. A protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor peptide (50 micromol/l) in the pipette reduces the PACAP-38-induced K(ATP) current to 33 +/- 17 pA/pF (P < 0.05, n = 6) without significantly affecting the currents induced by cAMP or VIP. The results suggest that: 1) PAC(1), VPAC(1), and VPAC(2) are present in atrial myocytes; and 2) PACAP-38 activates the atrial K(ATP) channels through both PKA and PKC pathways.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baron et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: