Why the study?
Does the use of biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents reduce the risk of stent thrombosis compared to durable polymer drug-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease?
Does the use of biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents reduce the risk of stent thrombosis compared to durable polymer drug-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease?
Biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents significantly reduce the risk of very late stent thrombosis compared to durable polymer stents, despite no difference in overall definite and probable stent thrombosis.
Delayed re-endothelialization may be the pathophysiological cause of stent thrombosis (ST). Biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents (BP-DES) may reduce the risk of ST. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of ST in patients treated with BP-DES. Studies were retrieved from the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE online databases. Twelve studies (15,155 patients) with long-term follow-up (≥ 12 months) were included. Compared with durable polymer drug-eluting stents (DP-DES), BP-DES did not significantly decrease the risk of definite and probable ST (RR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.18; P = 0.425) and definite ST (RR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.30; P = 0.648). Furthermore, there was no difference in the risk of late ST (RR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.39 to 3.53; P = 0.780). However, the rate of early ST was slightly higher in the BP-DES group (RR, 1.60; 95% CI, 0.94 to 2.73; P = 0.084) than in the DP-DES group. A significant reduction in very late ST (> 12 months) was evident with the BP-DES group (RR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.68; P = 0.006). Subgroup analysis showed that there was no difference in the rate of definite and probable ST between the BP-DES and first- or second-generation DES groups.Biodegradable polymer stents were associated with a significantly lower risk of very late ST. However, there was no difference in the risk of definite and probable ST between the two groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jing Zhang (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: