Why the study?
Does monitoring of platelet inhibition improve the efficacy and safety of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists compared to standard weight-adjusted dosing?
Does monitoring of platelet inhibition improve the efficacy and safety of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists compared to standard weight-adjusted dosing?
Monitoring platelet inhibition may be necessary to individualize glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonist therapy and improve clinical outcomes due to interindividual variability.
Variability in GPIIb/IIIa response cautions against uniform dosing; leaves open whether platelet monitoring improves outcomes in trials.
Unlike other available antiplatelet agents, a clear dose-effect relationship for the platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antagonists was well established in animal models prior to study in humans. Based on these early studies, a specific level of blockade of platelet GPIIb/IIIa receptors was identified as that necessary to prevent intraarterial thrombus formation, and this target level was carried forward into clinical trials. Subsequently, the efficacy of these agents in preventing thrombotic events has been confirmed in placebocontrolled trials involving nearly 50,000 patients (1,2). Despite these overall positive findings with GPIIb/IIIa receptor-blocker therapy, several large individual studies, in specific patient populations or with suboptimal dosing regimens, have found a lack of effect in preventing thrombotic complications (3,4). These results raise the question as to whether a specific dose of a GPIIb/IIIa antagonist, adjusted only by patient weight, can provide the same level of platelet inhibition across all clinical syndromes and across all individuals. If there is interindividual variability in response to standard dosing of GPIIb/IIIa antagonists, monitoring of platelet inhibition would allow for individualization of therapy and might improve the efficacy and safety of these agents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Steven R. Steinhubl (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: