Why the study?
Identifying ischemic stroke patients at high risk for paroxysmal AF could individualize prolonged ECG monitoring, which is not routinely applied in clinical practice.
Does automated software-based analysis of 1-hour Holter ECG improve the prediction of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation during 72-hour monitoring in patients with acute ischemic stroke/TIA?
Does automated software-based analysis of 1-hour Holter ECG improve the prediction of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation during 72-hour monitoring in patients with acute ischemic stroke/TIA?
Automated software-based analysis of the first hour of Holter ECG data significantly improves the prediction of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in acute ischemic stroke/TIA patients compared to clinical risk scores alone.
May support risk-stratified Holter allocation after stroke; leaves open outcome benefits in prospective trials.
OBJECTIVE: Identification of ischemic stroke patients at high risk for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (pAF) during 72 hours Holter ECG might be useful to individualize the allocation of prolonged ECG monitoring times, currently not routinely applied in clinical practice. METHODS: In a prospective multicenter study, the first analysable hour of raw ECG data from prolonged 72 hours Holter ECG monitoring in 1031 patients with acute ischemic stroke/TIA presenting in sinus rhythm was classified by an automated software (AA) into "no risk of AF" or "risk of AF" and compared to clinical variables to predict AF during 72 hours Holter-ECG. RESULTS: pAF was diagnosed in 54 patients (5.2%; mean age: 78 years; female 56%) and was more frequently detected after 72 hours in patients classified by AA as "risk of AF" (n = 21, 17.8%) compared to "no risk of AF" (n = 33, 3.6%). AA-based risk stratification as "risk of AF" remained in the prediction model for pAF detection during 72 hours Holter ECG (OR3.814, 95% CI 2.024-7.816, P < 0.001), in addition to age (OR1.052, 95% CI 1.021-1.084, P = 0.001), NIHSS (OR 1.087, 95% CI 1.023-1.154, P = 0.007) and prior treatment with thrombolysis (OR2.639, 95% CI 1.313-5.306, P = 0.006). Similarly, risk stratification by AA significantly increased the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for prediction of pAF detection compared to a purely clinical risk score (AS5F alone: AUC 0.751; 95% CI 0.724-0.778; AUC for the combination: 0.789, 95% CI 0.763-0.814; difference between the AUC P = 0.022). INTERPRETATION: Automated software-based ECG risk stratification selects patients with high risk of AF during 72 hours Holter ECG and adds predictive value to common clinical risk factors for AF prediction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gröschel et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: