Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Meat-type pullets of two strains, housed in windowless floor pens, were subjected to two stimulation lighting treatments beginning at 140 days of age. The treatments provided increases in photoperiod from 6 to 16 hr/day by either 1) 5 increases of 2 hr/day each week or 2) increases each of 2 and 1 hr/day followed by 14 increases of .5 hr/day each week. Overall, there was no significant difference due to lighting treatment in number of hatching eggs per hen housed. However, age at 50% production was 6.3 days less; percentage hen egg production was higher, 56.2 vs. 54.2; and egg weight was .8 g lower for hens of Treatment 1 vs. Treatment 2. For the strain with lower egg size, the number of additional eggs obtained for Treatment 1 was no greater than losses due to undersized eggs. For the strain with higher egg size, Treatment 1 prevented excess body weight gain and permitted earlier egg production. The merits of using rapid vs. slow stimulator lighting procedures for meat-type birds depend on the egg and body weight characteristics of the strain of hen.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
N.A. CAVE (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: