Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The effects of lighting pattern on production to 399 d in caged, female, meat‐strain chickens was investigated. Energy intake was controlled from 56 to 399 d. 2. Four different rearing treatments with a subsequent constant 16‐h photoperiod during laying were used. 3. A 15‐h rearing photoperiod resulted in delayed sexual maturity, increased mature body weight and decreases in both total egg numbers and the proportion of smaller eggs, compared with a 6‐h photoperiod. 4. Continuous light to 56 d, although associated with a high incidence of subsequent blindness, resulted in satisfactory egg production. 5. Abrupt reduction in the photoperiod from 15 to 6 h for the 112 to 167 d period resulted in unsatisfactory subsequent performance, especially when the day‐length was only slowly increased to 16 h during laying. 6. In the two laying treatments, in which the photoperiod was increased gradually from 6 to 16 h during the 168 to 238‐d period, a decrease in the number of smaller eggs occurred, compared with the treatments in which a single abrupt increase in photoperiod was used.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
C. G. Payne (1975) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: