Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
UNLABELLED: The aim of this study was to compare a distal subcapital oblique fifth metatarsal with a distal chevron osteotomy for correction of bunionette deformity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty cadaveric feet were randomly assigned to undergo either a subcapital oblique or chevron osteotomy of the distal fifth metatarsal. Radiographic measurements, including 4-5 intermetatarsal angle (IMA), fifth metatarsophalangeal angle (5-MPA) and foot width, were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: Foot width and 5-MPA was significantly decreased in both groups with no difference between the groups. The 4-5 IMA was not significantly altered in either group. CONCLUSION: Decrease in foot width and 5-MPA was similarly achieved with either distal chevron or subcapital oblique osteotomy of the fifth metatarsal in normal cadaveric specimens. No significant difference was found between the 2 techniques in any of the radiographic parameters measured.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cooper et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: