Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The stereoselective interactions in aqueous solution between the crystal faces of centrosymmetric (R,S) serine 1 and additives resolved and racemic threonine 2 and allothreonine 3 were studied by four independent techniques: change in crystal habit on growth, anisotropic distribution of occluded additive during the crystal growth, etch pit formation on partial dissolution and atom‐atom potential energy calculations. The effects of the two diastereomers 2 and 3 are radically different due to differences in adsorption: threonine is adsorbed on the {011} crystal faces; the (R) enantiomer is adsorbed at, and eventually occluded through the (011) and (011) crystal faces replacing an (R) serine molecule. By symmetry, (S) threonine is adsorbed and occluded through the enantiotopic (011) and (011) faces replacing (S) serine. In contrast, (R) and (S) allothreonine are both adsorbed primarily at the (100) and (100) faces. The results indicate that the serine moiety of adsorbed threonine and allothreonine assume the same conformation and position as the substrate molecule. The additive is adsorbed only at specific sites such that the Cβ‐CH3 groups emerge from the crystal surface. The observed effects lead in the case of threonine, but not allothreonine, to the assignment of its absolute configuration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weissbuch et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: