Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Rationale/Purpose Little research has been completed in a New Zealand sport context exploring the industry-academic nexus. The purpose of this study is to examine the efficacy of a collaboration between a sport organisation and researchers to provide insights learned from the key partners’ perceptions.Design/Methodology/Approach Within a case study design, a qualitative thematic analysis of data gathered from semi-structured interviews with seven participants was employed to gain understanding of the partnership.Findings All respondents acknowledged the significant benefits of the industry-academic nexus and deemed the reciprocal relationship central to the project’s success, although there was some diffident sentiment about acknowledgement of contributions.Practical Implications Insights from the nexus, such as shared vision, delineating partnership parameters, a good people “fit”, and recognising equality in a partnership, could enhance the efficacy of community-focused partnership projects.Research Contribution This study broadens the understanding of industry-academia partnerships in a sport setting, reinforcing and extending the work on collaboration theory. The findings reinforce Mayer and Kenter’s (2016 Mayer, M., & Kenter, R. (2016). The prevailing elements of public sector collaboration. In J. C. Morris & K. Miller-Stevens (Eds.), Advancing Collaboration Theory: models, typologies, and evidence (pp. 43–64). Routledge. [Google Scholar]) collaborative framework and extends their nine elements of collaboration success including grounded and practically based academics, for industry to be open to the value of research, engagement of an insider researcher, and respect for all partners’ contributions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bradbury et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: